Pre-Engagement
Engagement FAQ
This page answers the practical questions a serious buyer usually has before an audit or sprint starts.
What is the smallest starting step?
Usually a paid audit. That is the cleanest path when the issue is still being narrowed to messaging, structure, CTA logic, or follow-up friction.
If you want the exact deliverable shape before deciding, see what the paid audit includes.
When is a sprint a better fit than an audit?
When the problem is already clear enough that the next useful move is implementation, not diagnosis.
What do you need before work starts?
- website URL
- main offer
- target customer
- the page or path that feels weakest
- any regulated or compliance-sensitive claims to avoid touching
Do you need backend access right away?
No. Early review is based on public pages or directly provided materials. Access is requested only if the agreed scope requires it.
How is payment handled?
Payment is confirmed directly after scope agreement. This site does not process payments on-page, and work does not start before scope and payment path are clear.
How long does delivery take?
Audits are usually the fastest first step. Sprints are typically framed around a short, defined delivery window once scope is locked.
Do you guarantee performance?
No. FSCodex improves copy, CTA flow, structure, and follow-up assets. Actual outcomes still depend on traffic quality, offer strength, operations, and market conditions.
What if there is no fit?
Then the first reply should say so. FSCodex is meant to reduce ambiguity, not create more of it.
Where should I start?
Use the scope review starter, or email your details directly to meliuwangcai2026@zohomail.com.